Rome Brought an Army. The Snake Required Artillery.
I would like to begin by stating that I do not enjoy this.
I have agreed to investigate Bigfoot, Dogman, lake monsters, flying creatures, seductive spirits, and several fishes that may or may not have existed outside William Beebe’s bathysphere window.
Giant snakes are different.
A giant snake is not an imaginative combination of animals. It has no wings, antlers, glowing eyes, or mysterious human face. It is simply a snake after somebody has removed the size restriction.
That is enough.
Childhood Vivie understood this perfectly. Adult Vivie may now approach the subject with scholarship, skepticism, and several decades of emotional regulation.
Childhood Vivie is already standing on the furniture.
The Roman Army Versus One Extremely Large Snake
Our story begins during the First Punic War, when Rome and Carthage were fighting for control of the western Mediterranean.
Around 256 BCE, the Roman consul Marcus Atilius Regulus led an army into North Africa. Somewhere near the Bagradas River, now called the Medjerda River in Tunisia, his soldiers reportedly encountered a serpent of astonishing size.
Not a soldier who glimpsed something moving through the reeds.
Not a shepherd who found an unusually wide trail.
An entire Roman military force.
According to later Roman accounts, the creature attacked soldiers who approached the river for water. Spears and javelins allegedly bounced from its scales. It crushed men, bit others, and disrupted the camp so thoroughly that ordinary weapons proved insufficient.
Regulus responded as military commanders do when nature refuses to cooperate.
He brought in a ballista.
Yes.
According to the story, Rome deployed siege artillery against a snake.
A large stone struck the serpent’s spine and disabled it. The soldiers then killed it, removed its skin, and sent the hide to Rome, where it was supposedly displayed for decades.
The reported length varies, but the number that survived most enthusiastically is 120 Roman feet.
That is somewhere around 115 modern feet.
No.
I reject it.
Not because I possess evidence that the story is false, although we will get to the evidence problem shortly. I reject it because 115 feet is not a snake. It is a municipal infrastructure project.
The Evidence Problem
The oldest detailed versions of the serpent story were written long after the alleged encounter.
That matters.
Polybius, our most important surviving historian of the First Punic War, describes Regulus’s North African campaign without mentioning the occasion when his army supposedly fought a snake with artillery.
You would think that might have made the report.
The tale appears in later Roman writers, including Valerius Maximus, Pliny the Elder, Aulus Gellius, and Orosius. Some of them may have drawn from earlier sources now lost to us, but we cannot independently verify what those sources said or how the account changed as it traveled.
The missing skin is another difficulty.
Writers claimed it had been displayed in Rome, but it did not survive, and we have no physical evidence demonstrating that a 115-foot serpent ever inconvenienced the Roman military.
What we have is a story repeated across centuries.
That does not make it worthless.
It does make it slippery.
Much like the subject.
Could It Have Been a Python?
The African rock python is real, formidable, and entirely capable of inspiring panic.
Large individuals can exceed fifteen feet, with exceptional specimens reported at greater lengths. A snake of that size appearing suddenly at a riverbank could kill a human being and terrify a group of soldiers unfamiliar with the animal.
Snake skins can also stretch significantly when removed and prepared. Fear stretches measurements even more efficiently.
A very large python could therefore sit beneath the legend.
The creature attacks. Men panic. The animal is killed. Its skin is stretched, displayed, described, and retold. Each generation adds a few feet because nobody ever improved a military story by announcing that the snake was somewhat above average.
Eventually, Rome has fought a serpent longer than a basketball court.
This is plausible as folklore formation.
It is not comforting.
“It may only have been a twenty-foot python” is a sentence scientists can say because scientists have confused explanation with reassurance.
Unfortunately, North Africa Really Did Have Giant Snakes
Here is where the story becomes rude.
In 1901, paleontologist Charles William Andrews described fossil vertebrae from Egypt belonging to an enormous extinct snake. He named it Gigantophis garstini.
The name essentially means Garstin’s giant snake, because paleontologists occasionally abandon subtlety in the presence of an appropriately terrifying spine.
Gigantophis lived roughly 35 to 40 million years ago in what is now North Africa. Early estimates placed it between about thirty and thirty-five feet long. A later study revised that estimate downward to roughly twenty-three feet, although reconstructing the total length of an extinct snake from a limited collection of vertebrae is not an exact business.
Twenty-three feet is still unacceptable.
More importantly, the fossils establish that North Africa once supported snakes much larger than most living species.
This does not prove that Regulus met one.
Forty million years separate Gigantophis from the Roman army, which is a fairly substantial scheduling conflict.
Still, the ground beneath the legend once held exactly the kind of animal the legend describes.
That feels unnecessarily provocative.
The Grove Take
I do not believe a 115-foot snake attacked Regulus’s army.
There is no physical evidence, the surviving written accounts are late, and the measurements are biologically extravagant. The most reasonable explanation is that an encounter with a large python became increasingly enormous as it passed through Roman literature.
But I understand why the story lived.
A soldier goes to the river for water and something erupts from the reeds. It has no legs to announce its approach. It moves with an efficiency that seems to violate the expected terms of anatomy. Weapons strike it and fail. Men who crossed the Mediterranean to fight Carthage suddenly discover that North Africa has entered the war independently.
Then someone sends for the artillery.
That is not merely an animal encounter. It is the moment human confidence meets a landscape that does not recognize human authority.
Rome could conquer cities.
The river still had opinions.
Porch Policy
No.
Absolutely not.
The Bagradas serpent is not being offered a chair on the porch.
The porch has load-bearing limits, and I have emotional limits. Both have been exceeded.
We will acknowledge the snake respectfully from a considerable distance. We will preserve its habitat. We will refrain from firing siege weapons unless the situation becomes genuinely unmanageable.
It may have the entire riverbank.
It may have the adjacent field.
It may, if necessary, have Tunisia.
But it cannot come onto the porch.
Some boundaries are sacred.
Childhood Vivie has spoken.
Leave a Reply